Michael specializes in international construction arbitration and has experience working for owners, contractors, and engineers. His work focuses on large scale infrastructure projects including pipelines, power generation and transmission, refineries, tunneling, mining and hospitals. Michael’s international arbitration experience includes disputes under ICC and UNCITRAL rules, as well as ad hoc rules.
Michael’s dispute practice relates to all manner of project delivery methods including design-build, design-bid-build, EPC and EPCM contracts, as well as Public Private Partnerships (P3). Michael has extensive experience with claims for disruption, delay and prolongation, designer negligence, and construction deficiencies.
Michael is the co-author of a chapter in "Review of Construction Law: Recent Developments" (Toronto: Carswell, 2012) on the subject of Building Information Modeling and its impact on the construction industry and common contracting practices. Michael is also a regular contributor to the Construction Law Letter (LexisNexis).Michael Valo
B.A. (Great Distinction), McGill University, 2007
J.D., University of Toronto, 2010
Called to the Bar of Ontario, 2011
Ontario Bar Association, Construction Law Section
American Bar Association Forum on Construction Law
International Bar Association
ICC Young Arbitrators Forum
- Ad hoc arbitration related to engineering deficiencies for a cross border crude oil pipeline project.
- ICC arbitration related to an EPC Contract for a coal fired power plant in Africa.
- ICC arbitration related to an ore slurry pipeline in Africa.
- ICC arbitration related to an ore processing plant in Africa.
- UNCITRAL arbitration related to a gas processing facility in northern British Columbia.
- Ad hoc arbitration related to a nickel hydrometallurgical processing facility.
- Various disputes related to a light rail tunneling project.
- Ad hoc arbitration related to a P3 contract for the design, construction, maintenance and operation of a series of highway service centres.
Valo, "Court Of Appeal Decision On Arbitrability Consistent With National Standards" (2017) 33:4 Construction Law Letter
Reproduced with permission of the publisher LexisNexis Canada Inc. from Construction Law Letter, Vol. 33, No. 4, March/April 2017
Valo and Maynard, "Pricing Lump Sum Deletions: Principles and Guidance" (2017) 33:2 Construction Law Letter
Valo, "Deferring to Arbitrators: The Right to be Wrong" (2016) 33:1 Construction Law Letter
Valo, "Discovery of Experts in International Arbitration" (2016) 32:4 Construction Law Letter
Valo and Wilkes, "Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses: A View from Ontario" (2014) 31:1 Construction Law Letter
Valo, "Deterrence and Denunciation: Court of Appeal Sends Strong Message on Workers' Safety" (2014) 30:3 Construction Law Letter
Valo, "Litigation Following Arbitration Acceptable where Cause of Action is Different" (2013) 29:4 Construction Law Letter
Valo, "Settlement Agreement Makes no Reference to HST: Should HST be Added?" (2013) 29:4 Construction Law Letter